Burn fat fast and get that toned sexy stomach with No-Stim

Along with diet and fitness, No-Stim effectively helps you burn fat in order to get that toned physique that we all truly want. No-Stim burns fat without stimulants because of a potent appetite suppressant and also thyroid boosting ingredients.

If you are tired of fat burners with stimulants that just make you crash, switch to 

No-Stim and you will be happy that you did.

Low Doses Of Aspartame Cause Cancer

“New Study - LOW DOSES Of Aspartame Cause CANCER

From Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum.
6-15-7  

Statement from Dr. Russell Blaylock, MD Dear Betty, My review of the first Ramazzini Study concluded that the study was one of the best designed, comprehensive and conclusive studies done to date on the multipotent carcinogenic potential of aspartame. This second study is even more conclusive, in that it shows a dose-dependent statistically significant increase in lymphomas/ leukemia in both male and female rats exposed to aspartame. These two cancers are the fastest growing cancers in people under age 30. Also, of major concern is their finding of statistically significant increases in breast cancer in animals exposed to aspartame. With newer studies clearly indicating that toxic exposures during fetal development can dramatically increase the cancer risk of the offspring, this study takes on a very important meaning to all pregnant women consuming aspartame products. Likewise, small children are at considerable risk of the later development of these highly fatal cancers. It should be appreciated that the doses used in these study fall within the range of doses seen in everyday users of aspartame. This study, along with the first study, should convince any reasonable scientific mind, as well as the public at large, that this product should be removed from the market. Russell L. Blaylock, M.D.  New Study - Low Doses Of Aspartame Cause Cancer Environmental Health Perspectives, the Journal of the U.S. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences ranks first among more than 200 environmental science and occupational health journals and is read in 190 countries. At New York’s Mt Sinai School of Medicine DR. MORANDO SOFFRITTI was honored in April with the Irving J Selikoff Award for Outstanding contributions to the identification of environmental and industrial carcinogens, and his promotion of independent scientific research. The prestigious Selikoff Award is only granted for groundbreaking cancer research. It was created 1993 by the Collegium Ramazzini, an academy of 180internationally renowned experts in occupational and environmental health from over 30 nations. It has been awarded just twice before being presented to Dr. Soffritti. His research was conducted for 36 months using 1,800 rats. It forced the conclusion that aspartame is a multipotential carcinogen. Cancers aspartame produced included leukemia, lymphoma, kidney, and cranial peripheral nerves among others. Only the rats fed aspartame got malignant brain tumors. This prodigious work was peer reviewed by 7 world experts. This work confirmed studies presented to the FDA 25 years ago that documented a catalogue of brain, uterine, ovarian, testicular, mammary, pancreatic and thyroid tumors. Based on the evidence FDA denied approval of aspartame for 16 years from the time it was discovered. Then Don Rumsfeld, who was the CEO of NutraSweet’s parent, the G. D. Searle Co., went to Washington to be newly elected Ronald Reagan’s Secretary of Defense. The existing FDA Commissioner was asked to resign and aspartame was approved by Arthur Hull Hayes appointed by President Reagan. He did this over the objections of the FDA’s scientific Board of Inquiry who had revoked the petition. President Reagan had written an executive order making FDA powerless to do anything about aspartame until Hayes could get to FDA. Now the floundering Searle became profitable. The compromised FDA had full knowledge of aspartame’s toxicity and the approval of this deadly carcinogen sentenced millions to disability and death. An Atlanta Journal Constitution article dated 9/25/85 was titled “Reagan Says He Quit Using Sweeteners”. It was in l985 there were two congressional hearings over the outrage of the public being poisoned. In this article it states: “President Reagan says he quit using artificial sweeteners because “we don’t know what is in them,”.. Unfortunately it was too late for the public as the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled in favor of NutraSweet, even though it was known that the FDA had asked for the indictment for Searle, and revoked the petition for approval. Soffritti’s new study “Lifespan Exposure to Low Doses of Aspartame Beginning During Prenatal Life Increases Cancer Effects in Rats” focused on damage from low-dosage aspartame consumption over the long term and clearly demonstrated a great danger to unborn babies and children. Newly identified is risk of breast cancer as the aspartame using child matures. Exposures were at low doses. A 20 kg (45 pounds) child drinking 2 cans of diet soda a day brings into his body 400 mg. of aspartame. Food & Drink Weekly reports that soda is the most commonly consumed beverage among children and soft drink consumption is up 500% over the last 50 years. American consumption has skyrocketed to over 600 12-ounce servings per person per year, and climbing. Cokes goal is to jump sales 25% annually. The aim of Soffritti’s new study was to identify the cancer risk aspartame presents, starting with the mother’s ingestion before the fetus is born. The study was conducted on groups of 70-95 male and female Sprague Dawley rats, administered aspartame with feed at concentrations of 2000, 400, or 0 ppm from the 12th day of fetal life until natural death. The results of this carcinogenicity bioassay confirm and reinforce the earlier studys demonstration of aspartame’s multipotential carcinogenicity. Further, the study demonstrates that when lifespan exposure to aspartame begins during fetal life, its carcinogenic effects magnify. Dr. Philip Landrigan, Chairman of Community and Environmental Medicine at Mt. Sinai Medical Center, says Dr. Soffrittis study on rats strongly implies human risk. He advises parents of young children to think very very carefully about giving drinks and other aspartame-contaminated foods to children. He advocates federal action be taken to review regulation of aspartame and that the chemical be submitted for precise critical investigation. The abstract and link to the full text to be published on EHP online, is on the homepage of the European Ramazzini Foundation: www.ramazzini.it Il secondo studio Ramazzini sullaspartame in stampa sul giornalescientifico Environmental Health Perspectives Un secondo studio sul dolcificante artificiale aspartame, della Fondazione Europea Ramazzini, dal titolo LEsposizione ad Aspartame a Basse Dosi, dalla Vita Fetale e per Tutta la Vita, Aumenta gli Effetti Cancerogeni sui Ratti, tato accettato per essere pubblicato su Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP). Labstract e il pdf del testo completo di EHP online, isponibile nellahomepage della Fondazione Europea Ramazzini: www.ramazzini.it Aspartame carcinogenicity has been known for decades. In 1985 Dr Adrian Gross, FDA toxicologist, warned Congress that aspartame violates the Delaney Amendment which prohibits from our foods any ingredient causing cancer in animals. See two letters Dr. Gross addressed to Senator Howard Metzenbaum, and the memo that triggered a request for indictment of Searle for fraudulent submissions: http:// www.dorway.com/gross.txtBoth US Prosecutors hired on the defense team and thestatute of limitations expired. Atty. James Turner, author of the Chemical Feast and the Nader Report on Food Protection at FDA, explains: “Since l974 FDA and the Searle Drug Company have known that aspartame causes brain tumors in animals. In 1980 the public has known the PublicBoard of Inquiry affirmed the Searle studies showed cancer in animals and ruled that it should not be used in the food supply. It is past time that the FDA invoked the Delaney Clause and remove NutraSweet from the market. In July of 2005 further studies(Ramazzini) underscored the cancer causing capability of NutraSweet/ aspartamein animals.” See Mr. Turner in Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World explain howRumsfeld’s aspartame got approved after FDA said no.http://www.soundandfury.tv/pages/rumsfeld2.html Ralph G. Walton, M.D. of Safe Harbor Behavioral Health, Erie, PA,emphasizes: ”Dr. Soffritti’s two outstanding studies on the multipotential carcinogenic effects of aspartame add significantly to the ever- growing body of evidence on the hazards of this artificial sweetener. The FDA’s stubborn adherence to their original, and controversial, approval of aspartame is unconscionable. The public must be informed that the approvals, both in this country and Europe, are based on highly questionable industry-funded research, or, in the case of recently issued statements on aspartame’s supposed safety, on a questionnaire which in no way represents legitimate research. Independent research, such as the recent Soffritti studies invariably demonstrates the extremely hazardous nature of this product.” .safeharborbh.org When the Ramazzini 2005 study was released the government and aspartame manufacturers were responsible for a coverup. They found an old AARP survey sent to amillion American seniors: 16 pages with 56 questions. It asked: How high did you go in school? Had a hysterectomy? Do you eat brownies? Oatmeal? Margarine? Question #25 asked “Over the last 12 months when you drank coffee or tea, what kind of sweetener did you regularly add?” There were 6 multi-choice selections, one of which was: Equal or aspartame The 10 year old 3-word item instantaneously converted the questionnaire into the biggest aspartame study in history! It showed no problems at all! (None were asked for!) Thru saturation news releases this propaganda spread planetwide in major magazines andother media. www.wnho.net/halt_the_spin_on_bogus_studies.htm Dr. Soffritti’s work was presented to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). The EFSA risk assessment has been criticized from the beginning because of conflicts of interest among the panel members, particularly the chair Susan Barlow, who is an industry consultant. They rejected Dr. Soffritti’s study with the lame excuse that cancers were caused by lung infections. Eminent Researchers and scientists know that respiratory infection is a factor in the dying process and never took their excuse as noteworthy. Ramazzinis control rats had a much lower incidence of cancers than the aspartame-fed rats. Critics of EFSA’s risk assessment said that if the cancers were caused by inflammatory lung disease than the control group would have had as many cancers as the rats fed aspartame. EFSA didn’t apologize so they were reported to the Universal Court of Justice. Then EFSA’s Dr. Koeter admitted that industry pressured them to hijack science. www.wnho.net/letter_to_efsa.htm Dr. H. J. Roberts, M.D., FACP, FCCP, author of several texts on aspartame disease commented: “The elegant studies by Dr. Morando Soffritti and his colleagues, coupled with other recent related publications, reinforce my longstanding opinion that aspartame products represent carcinogens — or co-carcinogens — forseveral major tumors in humans, especially involving the brain. ”The details appear in my text, Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic, and in my article, Does Aspartame Cause Human Brain Cancer? The latter indicated that aspartame or its metabolites “might activate one or more oncogenes that potentate or initiate cellmitosis, either by direct or indirect effects ”The failure of the FDA to acknowledge and act on the ongoing revelations over the last two decades about the hazards of aspartame products in a number of realms, especially when taken by children and pregnant women, remains a source of professional embarrassment. This chemical constitutes an imminent public health hazard. I congratulate Dr. Soffritti forindependently underscoring this warning.” Neurosurgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock remarked on Dr. Soffritti’s first study: “The study released in the European Journal of oncology by Morando Soffritti and co-workers should terrify mothers and all those consuming aspartame sweetened products. This was a carefully done study, which clearly demonstrated a statistically significant increase in several types of lymphomas and leukemias in rats. Both of these malignancies have increased significantly in this country since the widespread use of aspartame. ”The type of damage was a duplicate of that associated with cancers. Along with this most recent study, this means that drinking a single diet cola sweetened with developing a lymphoma or leukemia. ”They also found an increased incidence of malignant brain tumors, even though it was not statistically significant. This does not mean there is no association to brain tumors, since only the animals exposed to aspartame developed the tumors. With children and pregnant women drinking the largest amount of diet colas, this puts their children at the greatest risk of developing one of these horrible diseases. Their study found that even low doses ofaspartame could cause these malignancies; yet, the higher the dose, the more cancers that were seen. ”Since aspartame can increase obesity and may even cause the metabolic syndrome that affects 48 million Americans, there is no reason to ever consume this product. At the least it should be immediately banned from all schools.” Dr. Blaylock is author ofExcitotoxins: The Taste That Kills about aspartame. In order to save the children this Report For Schools is repeatedly sent to schools and board of educations.www.wnho.net/ report_on_aspartame_and_children.htm Will FDA finally admit aspartame approval was illegal, violating Delaney and also adulteration statutes? Aspartame is sold as an additive, but it’s a deadly excitoneurotoxic carcinogenic drug that interacts with all drugs and vaccines. Aspartame brain tumor cases from New York and New Jersey are being taken at this time. Just when you think the FDA can’t sink lower, they do. They issued a report the day before the release of the new study, denying its research, without any excuse. This was about the 2005 study but releasing this negative statement the day before the new one stands to confuse the public, as they intend.http://www.wnho.net/open_letter_to_laura_tarantino_fda.htm After a study sponsored by Food Standards in the UK showed additives cause behavioral problems in children, large food chains there began the removal of aspartame from their products. But not the FDA in the US who have known this for a quarter of a century.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7W-gba0GPwU From Atavistik Pictures: www.atavistik.comDr. Louis Elsas, pediatric professor, genetics, testified to Congress in l985 that it’s a teratogen and can trigger birth defects and mental retardation. It’s time for Congress to look into the matter that the FDA hasallowed aspartame to remain on the market for a quarter of a century even though they know it causes cancer, and a host of neurodegenerative diseases. The stream of whoppers continues www.wnho.net/whopper.htmjust like the millions of deaths from aspartame. 

Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum, FounderMission Possible International9270 River Club ParkwayDuluth, Georgia 30097770 242-2599http://www.wnho.nethttp://www.mpwhi.com/ Aspartame Toxicity Centerhttp://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame 

Full Body Exercise - Squat Muscles

Squats are a great exercise to do whether for burning fat, gaining muscle, or both!

No-Stim : Body Fat Loss, Hunger Control, Thyroid Function

No-Stim in particular is a great product because it not only works, but it also doesn’t contain any stimulants which is why most people do not like fat-burners. This product is effective because two different and very important functions. 

First off it acts as a very strong appetite suppressant because it contains certified real Hoodia extract which has been used for centuries for it’s ability to blunt hunger. It does so without any stimulants so you do not have a weird feeling in your stomach like you may get from stimulating products. Hoodia is expensive and many times companies therefore lie to their customers and will put inferior chemicals in place of the hoodia extract. 

The second very important part of this product comes from the thyroid boost that it gives you as it contains three different supplements that really rev up your metabolism. Iodine and tyrosine are the building blocks that our body uses to make the thyroid hormones in our body, without getting them into our bodies we are not putting ourselves in a position to be putting our body in the optimal metabolic state; Added to these is a naturally occurring thyroid metabolite to complete this stack.

The final ingredient in No-Stim is decaffeinated green tea extract. Green tea contains potent polyphenols which have been shown in studies to burn fat; All of the supplements come in the right quantities and are not too low like many supplements tend to be. Other than that I think the reviews speak for themselves.

Supplements are intended for healthy individuals with no prior illnesses , always consult your physician before starting any supplement regimen. This product does is not intended to treat, cure, or prevent any disease. 

People Love to Count Calories

The whole problem in my opinion with the way most people diet comes down to the fact that they only count calories but stop there. They do so because it is the simplest form of dieting that will yield some kind of results for someone who is currently eating improperly. People love to count calories for numerous reasons, unfortunately those reasons are not always what is best for both their health and fitness level.

Simplicity: Counting calories breaks down dieting into easy to understand terms that anyone can comprehend. Every food has a caloric measurement and people have a total number of calories as their overall goal. When things come that easy we should be suspicious, but unfortunately most people do not think like that as they only see the simplicity of it. If you are a beginner it is an option, otherwise you are honestly not truly trying your best to get results by only counting calories. 

Sugar: Calorie counting puts no restrictions on sugar intake. It doesn’t take into account the fact that sugar and carbs in general are scientifically shown to be harder for our bodies to burn off. By also not putting any restrictions on sugar it gives the would be dieter a way to rationalize consuming it and still making them think they are indeed dieting. This is especially dangerous considering the fact that sugar has been shown to be as addictive as cocaine. Allowing people to consume an addictive and toxic substance on a diet really exposes how simply just counting calories is not an intelligent way of dieting overall.

Public Info: Even with research showing issues with only counting calories and data showing that low fat diets are unsuccessful, counting calories is still the only information the public receives about dieting.. There are two reasons why this is the case and will continue to be so. First off people do not want to hear the truth that their simple way of dieting is not effective, they want to continue to be living the lie that is blind calorie counting to rationalize their questionable eating habits. The second reason is that the companies that sell these products that do not fit into an effective diet will do everything in their power to make sure the recommendations are not changed. Don’t believe me? Check out the sponsors at eatright.org

      There is nothing wrong with counting calories as long as you understand calories from carbohydrates are not equal to those from fat and protein. By properly managing our macronutrients it puts us in the best position to lose weight. If you are happy with just losing a few pounds and don’t feel like putting in the effort to get dramatic results that is fine, just don’t fault people who go all out to get the results they want. 

http://www.webmd.com/diet/news/20120626/all-calories-not-created-equal-study-suggests

For an excellent stimulant free fat loss pill check out No-Stim.com

By gaining negative associations, we lose pounds

It is so easy to just sit around and enjoy our sweets and other fattening foods when we are ignorant to the affect it has on our bodies. Once we truly learn about the negative effects that these foods have it changes our overall perception. Just like someone who has quit smoking cigarettes, someone who has reformed their eating habits can get grossed out by the idea of eating something sweet at times. Without that negative feeling we get it would allow us to get addicted to substances that feel or taste good like sugar does. To someone who has never kicked sugar they may be perplexed by the idea of someone being grossed out by the thought of sugar. In a way they are right though, the person isn’t actually grossed out by the sugar; They are grossed out at the memory of what they looked like naked (Or clothed) when they used to have less control over their diet. Negative associations can be very personal and unique to every person, whatever negative feeling we have about sugar or anything else is our negative association. I also imagine my teeth rotting when I eat sugar too, for me it is also a powerful negative association I have with sugar. 

      It is hard to just pick up a negative association over night. Unless someone we know died or we had issues ourself with something kicking any addiction can be tough. Even then addictive substances can still be too much for people to quit. In order to build these negative associations necessary to overcome our urges it first takes knowledge. That means that we must really have an understanding that what we are eating is bad for us. Even with this knowledge most people will still rationalize what they eat without even knowing it. A rationalization is known in psychology as one of the five defense mechanisms that we can use at times when we are being “defensive.” We rationalize things in our mind to avoid anxiety and to help protect our self esteem. Dealing with the truth can be a hard thing to do because we must accept what we are doing is actually wrong and not helpful to us. That is why everyone at an AA meeting must say, “My name is” "and I am alcoholic.”

      Sugar is indeed an addictive substance that is also toxic to our bodies. By confronting this fact and developing negative associations with sugar we can eventually think about sugar in a more healthful way that is better for both our health and also our figure. Building these negative associations is part of the lifestyle change that it takes to truly lose weight and to keep it off for good. By being mindful of the longterm ramifications of everything we put in our body we put in ourselves in a position to live a healthful and fit life.

For an excellent stimulant free fat loss pill check out No-Stim.com

No-Stim will not give you side effects such as rapid heart beat, jitters, high blood pressure and anxiety.

Just Try!

5 Advantages of Drinking Water In The Morning

Sugar Addiction: The Perpetual Cycle

     Sugar effects our insulin production which is the carrier hormone in our bodies. By eating too much sugar it throws our insulin production out of wack causing multiple negative effects in our bodies including weight gain. Different carbohydrates effect our insulin levels differently in terms of insulin production which is why we must use the glycemic index to judge which carbs we should and shouldn’t eat. Simple sugars are digested quickly and effect our levels the worst, while more complex carbs are have a slower absorption. Foods that contain fiber are also digested slowly giving us a better end result on our blood sugar levels, which is one of the many reasons why we should try to be adding fiber into our diet.

      To kick sugar we really need to go through a three day detox from this highly addictive substance. You may give in the first time you try to kick sugar, and you will probably feel guilty, but instead of letting it bring you down let it motivate you to not to give in the next time.

no-stim.com

Positivity!

Stop Looking At The Scale So Much!

Stop making your self insane by constantly looking at the scale every day. You will never get that true instant satisfaction that you crave so stop driving yourself crazy. For one thing it is truly inaccurate in the sense that it only measures your current weight. It doesn’t tell you how much water weight you have put on or if you have increased muscle mass as well.

People make the scale the end-all-be-all of dieting. Guess what? It’s not! Try doing a search on tumblr and you will find people reaching their weight loss goal, but not their true fitness goal. A much better determinant of our fitness is our body fat percentage, but even then our measurements can get skewed by water weight. Instead of stressing over the scale we should instead put our focus into our behaviors as they are the true determinant of what we will look and feel like in the future. 

But also don’t drive yourself too crazy with that either. Dwelling over bad eating decisions will just hurt your mojo and end up hurting you overall anyway. There is always tomorrow, so just make that count and everything will be okay. 

This message has been brought to you by No-Stim.com. Your stimulant free weight loss pill that comes with a money back guarantee. 

HIIT Abs

HIIT exercises are an excellent way to burn fat. Add this workout into your routine 3x a week while taking No-Stim for greater results!

Iodine & Tyrosine Boost Metabolism

The two building blocks in our body to make up our thyroid are Iodine and Tyrosine. By supplementing with both of these known thyroid boosting supplements, you can help achieve a fast metabolism which can in turn help you lose weight.

Iodine is found naturally in your diet if you eat kelp and Tyrosine is found in different forms

in different kinds of protein. Most people do not get the necessary amount of Iodine and Tyrosine for proper thyroid production in their body. By supplementing with No-Stim you can put your body in a position to burn more fat than it normally would have.

no-stim.com

Green Tea Leaf found in No-Stim

One tablet of No-Stim contains 400mg of Green Tea Leaf extract.

Check out these great health benefits of Green Tea!

Weight Loss - boots metabolism

Diabetes - helps regulate blood sugar

Heart Disease - works on the lining of blood vessels, helping keep them stay relaxed and better able to withstand changes in blood pressure. It may also protect against the formation of clots, which are the primary cause of heart attacks.

Cholesterol - reduces bad cholesterol in the blood and improves the ratio of 

good cholesterol to bad cholesterol.

Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s - may delay the deterioration caused

 by Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s.

Blood Pressure - regular consumption of green tea is thought to reduce the risk of high blood pressure.

Skincare - can also help with acne, wrinkles and the signs of aging, this is because 

of the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities.

Hoodia Gordonii

The ingredient “Hoodia Gordonii” found in No-Stim has been used for centuries by indigenous populations of Southern Africa to suppress appetite on long hunting trips through the Kalahari Desert.